March 2007

Poison Study

Well sassymonkey turned out to be right after all. Poison Study was difficult to put down once I got into it. That whole getting into it thing was a problem. It was really slow for the first chapter or two. I thought sassymonkey had lost her mind.

I thought this was a YA book but it isn’t – why isn’t it? Oh more money in adult books, maybe? Maybe it is the transgendered character keeping it from being a YA? Ha. I was surprised at the TG turn, pleasantly surprised actually. F2M TG, awesome – that is just not something you see everyday and certainly not an F2M TG with all of that power. I would love to hear the story of how that all came about. Not that I don’t like Yelena, I do. But I have a lot of questions about Ambrosia….

I’m off to read Magic Study now.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Poison Study Read More »

What the Dead Know

Oops, I’ve fallen behind in my book blogging. If I don’t watch out, I’ll turn into TW who never blogs her books and then where will I be? I don’t want to be a slacker! Heh.

My pal Katie sent me her copy of What the Dead Know. (She got it from the BlogHer Book Tour.)

How was it? It was good. I was a little worried that I wasn’t going to like it because TW read it first and made all sorts of whimpery homesickness sorts of noises because it is set in Maryland and TW grew up in Maryland. Not being a huge fan of the state of Maryland, I was afraid I was going to be left out. I wasn’t.

The idea of nostalgia and reliving a childhood was enough to hold my attention. Of course having the whole missing children aspect on top of it didn’t hurt.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

What the Dead Know Read More »

I’m not an angel, but I’m not mean

The blog posts slamming meankids and other sites like them can come off sounding a little bit too judgemental for me. I know that probably sounds funny considering the post I just made. I’m not going to pretend that I’m some angel or some perfect “digital citizen” (who said that over on the Stop Cyberbullying group? I don’t know, forgive me whoever it was. Ah the coolcat teacher, I should have known instantly.) I couldn’t pretend because I’m sure there would be people who would drop dead from laughter or out of anger if I even attempted it. I’ve made some snarky blog entries around here. Usually just a sentence or two, tucked in here and there. One of them made Scoble laugh and he even commented on my blog! (Darn blogger didn’t import comments so I lost that momentous event but I remember it!) I’ve also made some comments on blogs (and on boards and email lists) that I knew would cause a stir or get a rise out of someone (hi KB! smooch!) I am no angel but I am not a mean kid.

I will also disclose that I am currently subscribed to one blog that spends a considerable amount of time bashing celebrities. I am subscribed to it and skim it for items that I think my older children may be hearing about or reading about. I’m often tempted to unsubscribe because it makes me feel slimey. I was also subscribed to a blog that spends a considerable amount of time, though less lately, bashing key mommybloggers. The reason I subscribed to it and left it in my feedreader was because I was trying to figure out why these sites are created and why they cause such a frenzy. I was doing this for my personal us/them thoughts and for my professional life as well. I deal with online communities and the more I can figure out about how people think and work and interact with each other, the better off I am. I’m no longer subscribed to this site. I think I’ve learned all I can learn – which wasn’t much.

I said before that I don’t have any respect for sites like meankids and I mean it. I don’t. And I have a hard time maintaining respect for the people who participate in them and link them and laugh over them. I don’t get it. I don’t understand what they get out of it, particularly some of the most popular and well-respected people in the blogosphere. I actually unsubscribed from one woman’s blog a couple of weeks ago simply because she was actively linking to meankids – before that, I thought she was fantastic. She may still be fantastic, but her links colored my view of her and I no longer enjoyed reading her blog. I found I no longer cared about her personal life or her professional views.

KK and others are asking whether sites like meankids have a right to exist. I have a hard time saying that they don’t. I also have a hard time saying groups like the KKK don’t have a right to exist. I’m the one who stands up for the religious right members who consistently bash gays and lesbians – and I am a lesbian.

I said in comments on BlogHer that I didn’t think there was a real solution to the issues we’re all focusing on right now and I believe that. There are people in the world who resort to misogynist comments, racially motivated attacks and stereotypes, hate speech, manipulation and threats. Those people obviously exist in the blogosphere. You can’t stone them, you can’t take away their internet connection. If you don’t like them, don’t agree with them then it is unfortunately up to you to figure out how to live beside them. How do you do that without stooping to their level, we’re all human after all? How do you do that without letting them intimidate you into moving to a new neighborhood or a new job or ending your participation in online discussions?

I don’t know but I’m thrilled that so many people are interested in talking about this.

Last year’s us/them phone calls were a wonderful thing. The discussions we had within that very small group were tremendously helpful simply because we could vent, question, and even debate these topics safely. The discussions going on now are very similar – just on a much larger scale and I am really loving this.

Shelley said in a BlogHer comment that she didn’t think a banner or a civility pledge were going to be the solution. She’s right. But the discussion around civility and banners is the only solution we have. As long as people are talking about this and thinking about this then we can work on ways to cope with hate speech and net rage (thanks swamphag!) Discussions and pledges of support to victims of these attacks, are the solution. Pledges of civility, as long as they are acted on, are the solution. Refusal to support those who find these sites acceptable are another type of solution.

I’ve already said that I will not support the sites that are created simply to attack, demean, intimidate or harrass others and I mean that. If I see someone linking or participating in such a community, I’m going to speak out. I’m not going to “feed the trolls,” this isn’t about trolls. There’s a difference, a very big difference.

I am no angel. I will still drop an occasional bit of snark here and there. I will stir the pot occasionally. That’s who I am. But I’m not mean and I don’t do hate. That’s my solution.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

I’m not an angel, but I’m not mean Read More »

Where I disagree with Shelley … and others

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about what I would write about Kathy Sierra’s post. I’ve read a LOT of blog posts and a lot more comments and nothing I’ve read has caused me to change my mind. And believe me, I’ve considered this all very carefully. All of that pondering is why it has taken me this long to write this post, the one I wanted to write the very first night as I read email after email saying we shouldn’t blog about this, we shouldn’t link Sierra, we shouldn’t “feed the trolls”, we shouldn’t attach ourselves to the post because Kathy named names… because Kathy over-reacted…

Bullshit. Excuse me, but that’s the way I feel.

To the people who have felt the need to post things like “oh nobody should get death threats but I get them all of the time and I just shrug them off” (inferring somehow that Sierra wasn’t strong enough because she couldn’t – or was just trying to stir up trouble…) – bullshit.

If you choose to accept this type of treatment, then that’s your decision but do not ever hold someone else to your standards when it comes to something this serious. If you truly are afraid, for your physical or emotional safety then it is your right to say something and to do whatever it takes to feel safe. If you’ve never felt that type of fear then you have no right to say “well I deal with it, so should you.” I’m also tempted to say it is your responsibility as a citizen to speak up, to stop this before more people are hurt. But that’s going too far. Not everyone feels the need to protect others.

To the people, who said that Sierra made unfounded accusations or has caused harm to innocent people by pointing fingers – bullshit. (And I’m just linking Shelley here, though I could link dozens more, because it was her post that I replied to first when all of this started and because I think she will understand that I still respect her and have had some good discussions with her in the comments at Blogher. I’m not sure others I could link to would understand. Trust is important, and I do trust Shelley.)

Kathy didn’t make unfounded accusations nor did she do harm to innocent people. What she said in her blog post was true and I don’t consider those she named to be innocent.

a group of bloggers including Listics’ Frank Paynter, prominent marketing blogger Jeneane Sessum, and Raving Lunacy Allen Herrel (aka Head Lemur) began participating on a (recently pulled) blog called meankids.org.

This is true, none have attempted to deny their participation in meankids.

The “Bob’s Yer Uncle” site was supposedly started by Cluetrain co-author Chris Locke (who, along with Jeaneane Sessum, also authors the Kat Herding Media site) and included most of the same members as meankids.

Also true.

I don’t know which particiant actually made the picture. It may have been Joey, or Chris Locke, or perhaps Allen Herrel… the same Herrel (or someone pretending to be Herrel) who added these frighteningly misogynistic comments on a different Unclebobism post: (***images w/ Herrel’s name attached to them***)

True because she clearly said she doesn’t know and Herrel OR SOMEONE PRETENDING TO BE HERREL.

I do not want to be part of a culture where this is done not by some random person, but by some of the most respected people in the tech blogging world. People linked to by A-listers like Doc Searls, a co-author of Chris Locke. I do not want to be part of a culture of such hypocrisy where Jeneane Sessum can be a prominent member of blogher, a speaker at industry conferences, an outspoken advocate for women’s rights, and at the same time celebrate and encourage a site like meankids — where objectification of women is taken to a level that makes plain old porn seem quaintly sweet.

(Of course, Frank and Jeneane are among the people who make outraged posts about the lack of female speakers at tech conferences. If THIS is what a woman has to put up with for having visibility in the tech world…)

These are her feelings about the type of community she does not want to be a part of. She does not say that any of these people sent her death threats, made the particular post with the noose or added the sexually violent images and text. She says they “celebrate and encourage” a site like meankids… and they most certainly did. And meankids WAS offensive and full of misogynist behavior, long before the attack on Sierra. ***Harrell did write to Doc to say he’d been the victim of identity theft, that doesn’t let him off the hook in my eyes. If it’s true, and I have no reason to believe it isn’t, then it simply means he didn’t write the comments that Sierra clearly said could have been posted by “someone claiming to be Harrell”. He was still involved with the community, just as the others Sierra mentioned were.

Kathy did not ever say anything that wasn’t out there for all of the world to see (and in some cases still available thanks to Google.) I have no respect for sites like meankids and I will not read the blogs or link to the participants of these sites. Nor will I support their personal or professional endeavors as long as they encourage and/or participate in this type of site.

I’ll be back again at some point to blog about sites like the defunct meankids. Until then, I respectfully disagree with many of you.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Where I disagree with Shelley … and others Read More »

Daily Dose of Cupcakes

ants.jpgEarlier this week TW linked me to a “Suntube” video earlier in the week and a segment featured the Fire Ant Festival, which I always forget about until it is too late. And of course April Fool’s Day is near not to mention the birthday of someone who has a wonderful history with ants… my brother of course (bet some of you are surprised, aren’t you?) I can think of a half-dozen kids and adults who would find ant covered cupcakes a beautiful thing. So go for it, it will be a hit! I’ve thrown an insect themed birthday party before, kids love it! Try it. You’ll see.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Daily Dose of Cupcakes Read More »

New Moon

OK so I said I was reading What the Dead Know and here I am blogging New Moon instead. I wasn’t in the mood for missing girls, vampires and werewolves seemed like a much better idea. Besides, New Moon was another book I started but didn’t finish around the time of our trip to London and I was disappointed that I didn’t manage to get through more than the first 50 pages or so before I had to return it.

So, I read the rest of it in about 3 hours. It was just as good as Twilight – in some ways it was better. I really loved Jacob and I loved Emily, I’d like to know more about Emily and how she adjusted to living with the werewolves. And while I thought running off to Italy there at the end was a little much, I appreciate why the story went that way. I’m anxious to learn more about Bella’s “immunity”. When’s the next book due out? Oh, August 2007, cool! I can wait that long. Anyone getting a preview copy????

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

New Moon Read More »

Some stuff

Alright Modest Mouse! (Not that I don’t like Joss Stone, but still, it’s Modest Mouse! Totally cool.)

I have a knitting question for you knitters, obviously since non-knitters like me wouldn’t know the answer. So. You know how people take reading material into the bathroom, if they’re going to be there awhile – heh – do y’all take your knitting in there with you?

I am not fond of the new HP cover. Too cartoony. The characters look “Edge Chronicle-like”.

I think sassymonkey really could get lucky with Ami McKay. Would y’all like to help me encourage her to give it a go?

Yesterday was Diabetes Alert Day. You didn’t miss it did you? I missed it here, and at Blogher, but managed to get it up at work. Not that anyone noticed. Diabetes does not seem to be the “hot disease” at the moment. Go Colorectal Cancer!

OK that’s enough stuff for now. I’ll be back later with a book post. Goodie!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Some stuff Read More »

Exactly

I was soooo grouchy yesterday. I woke up grouchy today. All of the people attempting to defend the creators and supporters (and by support I mean commenters, linkers and readers) of meankids. What are they thinking?

Meankids wasn’t satire and it wasn’t sarcasm and it wasn’t snark. It was bullying, manipulation, attack, and hatred. That’s it. If you want to defend that, then who ARE you?

Thanks Liz. The more people talking the better.

Technorati Tags: ,

Exactly Read More »

Mean Kids errr People Suck

This is what’s wrong with the internet. Or more specifically online communities. Or even more specifically, online communities that don’t moderate themselves or their members. I can’t even believe I just typed that, but it’s true. And it’s why after all of these years I still moderate online communities. Even though I’m the moderator who usually rages against the machine in favor of less moderation, more freedom of expression, looser reins, more trust in the individuals who make up the community.

Bah.

For the record, I’ve never read anything on “meankids”. I do snark and sarcasm, I don’t do “mean”. Now, I’m playing catch up. Trying to sort out what went wrong and why. Like the always brilliant Shelley Powers, I’m not interested in pointing fingers at any individuals. Kathy can do that, with whatever evidence she has, and let the authorities take it from there if she has that kind of evidence or desire to push it.

I’m interested in what causes this. And how to stop it. Particularly since so much of it seems to be directed at women. And at children.

What gives someone the right to photoshop a kid’s photo. What gives someone the right to put a noose around Kathy Sierra’s neck? What gives someone the right to make sexual comments about a woman? What gives someone the right to degrade and threaten another human being – often a woman?

Patriarchy? Liz titled her post with a rage against patriarchy and I love her for that. It’s so easy to toss that phrase out. I do it everyday. Is it more than that? Is it something else entirely. The culture of the internet, Scoble said today. What’s driving us to create an internet space that looks the way it does today. That feels the way it felt today when I read Sierra’s post and just sat there not knowing what to say.

Nancy White helped organize and lead a small group of folks last year who wanted to discuss “us/them” situations within the Blogosphere and beyond. This is definitely an us/them situation. The problem is, the us/them line is getting more muddled everyday. The attacks back and forth and back again are growing and they’re getting uglier and more dangerous.

Kathy Sierra drew a line in the blogosphere today. I don’t know if it was the right line, but it was a line and I support her right to draw it. I support her right to tell people what she thinks and how she feels. I support her right to fight back in any way she feels is right for her.

Be careful of turning your back on her and on this issue. One day it may be you with a noose around your neck on a blog, it may be you with the death threats – your odds are great, especially if you’re a woman.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mean Kids errr People Suck Read More »